Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Sudden Oak Death Horticulture

Agenda-2010 pilot study results and planning for 2011 monitoring


AGENDA

10:00                                     Introductions
stream monitoring mtg july 29 2010 KPC2 – Marianne Elliott
Molecular identification of Phytophthora spp. and results – Katie Coats
Student projects at Pierce College  – Dale Blum
LRollins_WSU – Lucy Rollins
Results of 2010 monitoring by DNR  – Dan Omdal

12:00                                     Lunch

1:00                                        Discuss sites for 2011 monitoring, additional projects, volunteer activities

2:00                                        Adjourn

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Meeting Minutes-Planning Meeting for Stream Monitoring Pilot Study, January 27, 2010


Planning Meeting for Stream Monitoring Pilot Study, January 27, 2010

Meeting Minutes

Attending:

(WSU-Puyallup) Marianne Elliott, Gary Chastagner, Annie DeBauw, Gil Dermott, Katie Coats, Kathy Riley ; David Wetzel, Puyallup High School ; Dan Omdal, Depart. of Natural Resources plant pathologist ; Cindy Cooper, WSDA; Erica Cline, UW Tacoma; John Browning, Weyerhaeuser plant pathologist ; Wanda Booth and Nancy Steel, King Co. Master Gardeners; Peg Tillery, Kitsap Co. Beachwatcher program

The purpose of the stream monitoring study was discussed. Early detection of P. ramorum and baseline information about Phytophthora spp present in streams are two goals of the project. Also expanding to cover areas not being monitored by WSDA and DNR.

The first order of business was to select 4 stream sites for baiting. One person in each location will be responsible for organizing volunteers for baiting. Baits will be deployed and retrieved at two week intervals for six baiting periods. Proposed locations include:

  1. Poulsbo stream in Kitsap County (Dogfish Creek?) location where Dan Omdal baited for 4 years. This site has been negative for P. ramorum, suggesting that the nursery upstream has been successful in eradicating P. ramorum when it was found in 2006. The stream has consistent water levels and is located near a medical office with good public access. Peg Tillery said she would be in charge of organizing this site.
  2. Clarks Creek at either a location near 56 th Street E. or possibly at Dan Picha property off of West Stewart where Dave Wetzel’s students have worked before. Dave will check with Dan to see if he is willing to have a bait site there. Erica Cline will coordinate with Dave in order to also have UW Tacoma students involved at this site.
  3. King County, near Redmond, at either Evans Creek which has housing developments nearby, or Peters Creek. Wanda Booth will be organizing this location.
  4. Olympia, Thurston County, near the Johnson Point area, was proposed by Cindy Cooper. Marianne will look into finding volunteers to monitor in this area.
  5. There were technical difficulties in communicating with Snohomish County, but if they want to select a stream and organize volunteers it will be included in the study.

A site in Clark County was also mentioned, but it was decided that that was too far to go this year and may be added in the future.

Organizers will get back to Marianne by next week with their decisions/information on locations.

The logistics of leaves, bags, duration of exposure, collection days, etc were discussed. Annie DeBauw will be in charge of distributing leaves to organizers at the proper times. We will be using fully expanded (mature) rhododendron leaves of the cultivar ‘Nova Zembla’ which WSU uses in its experiments and that they have readily available at Puyallup and will be providing to the volunteers. The baits will be put out ~ 6 times beginning the last week of February at 2-week intervals at the 4 sites using 4 rhody leaves for each baiting. Stream temperatures will be taken either on a continuous basis with a sensor that is placed in the bait bag or with a thermometer at the time of sample collection. The timing of the bait removal and renewal may change to a shorter or longer period depending on changing stream temperatures, how the rhody leaves are holding up, symptoms or lack of infection, vandalism, etc, over the course of the 12-week period. The most likely days for the bait change will be Wednesday for Puyallup High School (Clarks Creek) and Monday for the other 3 sites. This will allow plenty of time for samples to be received at WSU for processing. In addition, the extra slot in the bait bag can be used for a leaf of another species of the organizer’s choice as kind of “just out of curiosity” study.

Dan Omdal suggested leaving the bait bags in place and that when leaves are collected, they should be rinsed in the stream to remove any external sediment or other crud before transporting them. The likely method of storage will be between moist paper towels in a plastic baggie, but we will go over the collection and shipping process at the time of training at each of the sites, which will take place during the last week of February at the time the first bags are put out. Instructions for handling and shipping the baits will be provided in a manual for volunteers.

Master Gardener diagnosticians (and possibly students) who will be involved with sample processing at WSU Puyallup will receive training on laboratory methods at a time to be determined, probably the second week of March when the first bait samples will be processed. In future, Katie Coats may also possibly have opportunities for students to work on DNA sequencing.

Peg Tillery noted that there are online forms for WSU volunteers that keep track of their hours and that could be used for our records. This is important information for getting grants. This would include the high school student volunteers. Those that volunteer need to sign up so that they are covered under WSU for Labor and Industries insurance. WSU is holding a training session on volunteer reporting in Feb. and we will know more about procedures after that.

Marianne will also be keeping the SOD website up-to-date, so she will need lists of dates and personnel that can be posted on the website. All of data will also be put on the site, including maps of finds. She will send a link to you when that website location is ready. You can email her information to put on the calendar and website.

This is the year to “get the bugs out of the system”. WSU has applied for an NSF grant to start in 10/2010 for a 3-year study of Phytophthora biodiversity in forest settings using a stream baiting system. The collaboration with volunteer groups is an important element of this proposal and the stream site number would go up to 10. Other “jobs” this year involve someone to scout out more possible sites and possible projects to monitor water quality. Peg Tillery noted that the Stream Team in Kitsap Co. is already doing some of that kind of monitoring and she will check with them to see what kind of data they are taking.

Erica Cline is interested in some extra projects that Gary Chastagner would like to do in conjunction with this year’s work. They involve testing Rhododendron macrophylum leaves, which Dan Omdal has used in his baiting work, versus the ‘Nova Zembla’ leaves to determine if there are any differences in handling the leaves, etc. Also, he would like to do a 2-week vs. 4-week baiting mini-test. Both of these would take place at Clarks Creek.

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Agenda-Planning meeting for stream monitoring pilot study Jan 27 2010


Planning meeting for stream monitoring pilot study

Jan 27 2010

Puyallup Room, WSU Puyallup

Agenda

1. Number of streams, locations – we’ll start with at least 4 streams in Western WA. There will be one bait site per stream, which will be monitored at 6 2 week intervals during the period of February – June 2010. Locations of these streams could be Pierce County, King County, Snohomish County, and Kitsap County. Preferred baiting sites would be downstream from P. ramorum positive nurseries that haven’t been sampled earlier, or intensively.

2. Who does what – volunteer coordination, training, student projects, baiting, sample processing, Phytophthora ID

3. Logistics – getting the bait bags and leaf baits to and from the lab, bait deployment and retrieval, communication methods, other stuff I haven’t thought of but is probably important.

4. Schedule of events – training sessions, baiting, sample processing, results reporting.

5. Funding – we are applying for funding for two future monitoring projects. Some funds may already be available. The costs will be relatively low for supplies and materials.

Marianne Elliott

melliott2@wsu.edu

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Planning meeting for stream monitoring pilot study


Planning meeting for stream monitoring pilot study

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Population genetics of Pr in WA-Research


Population genetics of P. ramorum in Washington State

An Update on Microsatellite Genotype Information of Phytophthora ramorum in Washington State Nurseries 14 KB
Katie Coats, Gary Chastagner, Norm Dart, Meg M. Larsen, and Niklaus J. Grunwald
In Frankel, Susan J.; Kliejunas, John T.; Palmieri, Katharine M.  2010.  Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fourth Science Symposium.   Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-229. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 378 p.
 

slideshow1_35

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Evaluation of fungicides for use against P. ramorum


Evaluation of fungicides for use against P. ramorum

The Forest Service, Washington State Pesticide Commission, Pacific Northwest Christmas Tree Association, IR-4 program, and the WSDA Nursery Research Program are supporting research at WSU Puyallup to determine the effectiveness of various fungicides in protecting conifers and rhododendrons from infection by this pathogen. This work has shown that several traditional contact materials, such as mancozeb, and the systemic material Subdue MAXX, have the potential to provide excellent control of diseases caused by P. ramorum. However, growers and regulatory agencies are concerned that the use of fungicides may be masking symptom development, thus making it harder to prevent the spread of this pathogen on infected nursery stock. Additional studies will be conducted at the National Ornamentals Research Site at Dominican University, California (NORS-DUC) to determine the residual effectiveness of fungicides and determine if any of them have the potential to mask symptom development on infected plants.

DSC06449 sm

Publications

Effectiveness of fungicides in protecting conifers and rhododendrons from Phytophthora ramorum 220 KB
Gary A. Chastagner, Annie DeBauw, Kathy Riley, and Norm Dart

Cristi Palmer and Ely Vea. 2006. IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Phytophthora Efficacy.

Chastagner, G.A., E.M. Hansen, K.L. Riley, and W. Sutton. 2005. Effectiveness of fungicides in protecting Douglas-fir shoots from infection by Phytophthora ramorum. Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium II, 18-21 January 2005, Monterey, CA.

Chastagner, G.A., E.M. Hansen, K.L. Riley, and W. Sutton. 2004. Effectiveness of fungicides in protecting Douglas-fir shoots from infection by Phytophthora ramorum. Phytopathology 94: S16.

Chastagner, G.A., E.M. Hansen. 2003. Identification of fungicides to control sudden oak death. Christmas Tree Lookout 36(3): 7-9.

Chastagner, G.A., E.M. Hansen, K.L. Riley, and W. Sutton. 2003. Identification of fungicides to control sudden oak death. In: Program and abstract book, sixth international Christmas tree research and extension conference; 2003 Sept. 14-19; Hendersonville, NC; 36.

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Host Testing


Host Testing

Susceptibility, severity, and sporulation potential of Phytophthora ramorum on several Rhododendron species and hybrids

Marianne Elliott, Gary Chastagner, Katie Coats, Annie DeBauw, and Kathy Riley, Washington State University, Puyallup Research and Extension Center, 2606 W. Pioneer, Puyallup, WA 98371; melliott2@wsu.edu

Several plant genera are important in the spread of Phytophthora ramorum in nurseries. These include Rhododendron, Camellia, Viburnum, Pieris, and Kalmia. Very few studies have been done on these potentially important epidemiological hosts in nurseries. In an effort to reduce the risk of P. ramorum being introduced onto their sites, some nurseries have reduced or eliminated these species from their inventory.

DSC06130 rhody

Rhododendrons are an important nursery crop in the Pacific Northwest and have accounted for about 78% of the infected plants associated with positive nurseries in Washington since 2004. In an effort to identify the risk that certain Rhododendron species and hybrids pose in spreading this pathogen we have been examining the susceptibility and sporulation potential of P. ramorum on 42 Rhododendron species and 58 hybrids using an isolate of P. ramorum originally taken from Rhododendron. This isolate belongs to the NA1 lineage, which is the most commonly detected lineage of P. ramorum in Washington nurseries. Detached leaves were inoculated with a zoospore suspension on the upper and lower surfaces in both wounded and non-wounded treatments. Lesion area was measured after 5 and 10 days and production of sporangia and chlamydospores was assessed for each species and hybrid.

There was a great deal of variability among Rhododendron species and hybrids in their susceptibility to infection by P. ramorum, severity of symptoms, and production of sporangia and chlamydospores. Several species and hybrids could be considered resistant, with low incidence and severity of disease and low levels of sporulation. These would be good candidates for nursery production and possibly for future hybridizing material. Likewise, several species and hybrids that were very susceptible and supported high levels of sporulation were identified. In most cases lesions were larger on wounded than non-wounded leaves, and there was a higher infection frequency on the lower leaf surface than on the upper surface.

in

Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fourth Science Symposium 2010
Susan J. Frankel, John T. Kliejunas, and Katharine M. Palmieri, tech. coords.

Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-229. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 378 p

abstract poster

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013

Pacific Northwest broadleaf hosts


Pacific Northwest broadleaf hosts

One of the major factors that will affect the potential spread of Phytophthora ramorum in western Washington forests is the ability of this exotic pathogen to sporulate on known and potential hosts within these forests. In California, the ability of P. ramorum to produce large quantities of inoculum on California bay laurel is a major factor in the epidemiology of sudden oak death in their forest ecosystems. Tanoak appears to be the most important epidemiological host associated with the spread of P. ramorum in southwestern Oregon forests. In the United Kingdom, sporulation on rhododendron within forests appears to be responsible for the spread of this pathogen to several forest trees.

DSC02551 sm

Western Washington is considered to be at high-risk for the spread of P. ramorum. Limited information is available regarding the sporulation of P. ramorum on hosts in western Washington forests. Research is underway to determine the potential for P. ramorum to sporulate on known and potential hosts that commonly occur in western Washington forests. This information will increase our understanding of potentially important epidemiological hosts and provide insights on the role they may play in the spread of P. ramorum in forest ecosystems where other important epidemiological hosts, such as California bay laurel and tanoak do not occur.

Studies with known conifer hosts, such as Douglas-fir, indicate that infection occurs during the early stages of shoot emergence. Thus, sporulation on hosts such as madrone and big leaf maple which potentially have foliage within the mid to upper canopy of the forest probably pose the greatest threat to spreading the disease to established conifers. Although one small preliminary study suggests that P. ramorum does not produce sporangia on infected Douglas-fir and grand fir shoots, additional tests are needed to confirm this and determine the potential for it to sporulate on other conifer foliage within Washington’s forests. Although potentially less important as a source of inoculum for standing trees, sporulation on understory shrubs, like Pacific rhododendron and salal, may be important sources of inoculum that may contaminate logs during harvest.

A laboratory study using detached leaves of some common broadleaf hosts found in the PNW was undertaken in summer of 2009 and 2010. Leaves were inoculated with a zoospore suspension of an NA1 isolate of P. ramorum and lesion area and infection frequency was evaluated. If P. ramorum was recovered from a leaf that did not show a visible lesion, it was considered to be infected asymptomatically. Sporulation potential of foliage of each plant species was also determined.

In general, the results of this study indicate that western Washington forests are not at high risk for damage caused by P. ramorum, based on the host plants tested. However, this is a subset of the many plant species that occur, and there may be a host species that is either extremely susceptible to infection or a prolific sporulator, that was not tested in this study. Plants posing the smallest risk of P. ramorum establishment were generally invasives and/or riparian species. The highest risk plants were commonly found in forested environments. These were fairly susceptible to infection and produced more chlamydospores than sporangia in their foliage.

Chlamydospore production was higher than sporangia production on many hosts in western Washington forests that were examined in this study. In other systems, such as bay laurel (Umbellularia californica) in California, and Rhododendron ponticum in the UK, P. ramorum outbreaks are driven by high concentrations of sporangia produced on foliage of these hosts. None of the Washington hosts tested produced as many sporangia as U. californica. Chlamydospores are a means by which P. ramorum can persist on a site in soil and decaying foliage, but will probably not produce large amounts of inoculum unless they germinate directly into sporangia, which can occur in flooded soils.

Publications

Phytophthora ramorum isolated from California bay laurel inflorescences and mistletoe: possible implications relating to disease spread 174 KB
Gary A. Chastagner, Kathy Riley, and Norm Dart

Contact: Gary Chastagner, 253-445-4528 | WSU Puyallup Research & Extension Center, 2606 West Pioneer, Puyallup, WA, 98371-4998 USA
Last updated January 2, 2013